Oral health in children

Start Well · Joint Strategic Needs Assessment topic page

Last updated

10 November 2026

What is it?

This topic is about the health of children’s teeth and mouths, and above all tooth decay, which is largely preventable. It covers how common decay is, which children are most affected, and what helps prevent it.

  • Tooth decay: damage to the teeth, made more likely by having sugary food and drink often. The national survey counts decay that has reached the layer under the enamel (the dentine) and can be seen without an X-ray. OHID OHID
  • Fluoride: a mineral that helps prevent and control tooth decay, which is why children’s toothpaste contains it. NHS
  • Fluoride varnish: a protective coating painted on children’s teeth to help prevent decay, at the dentist or through programmes in nurseries. DHSC and NHS England NICE
  • Supervised toothbrushing: daily toothbrushing with fluoride toothpaste, supervised by staff, in nurseries and schools. NICE
  • National survey of five-year-olds: a survey of the teeth of five-year-olds in state schools across England, carried out every two years by the National Dental Epidemiology Programme. OHID

This page looks at tooth decay among five-year-olds in Bracknell Forest, how it differs between groups of children across England, and what helps prevent it.

The picture in Bracknell Forest

What the evidence shows locally: the scale of need, who it affects most and where it is greatest.

Why does this matter?

Good oral health is part of children’s general health and wellbeing, and of their development and readiness for school. Tooth decay is the most common oral disease affecting children and young people in England, yet it is largely preventable. It can cause pain and infection, and affect eating, sleeping, communication and socialising, and children miss school days for hospital treatment to remove decayed teeth. OHID Regularly having sugary food and drinks raises the risk of decay, as well as of obesity and type 2 diabetes. OHID

Oral health isn’t equal. Children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much tooth decay as those in the least deprived. OHID The national survey of five-year-olds shows differences between areas in both how many children have decay and how many teeth are affected, and exists to help councils, the NHS and partners understand their children’s oral health and highlight inequalities. OHID

Prevention starts early: brushing twice a day with fluoride toothpaste from the first tooth, having sugary food and drinks less often, and regular dental visits. NHS DHSC and NHS England For children at higher risk, NICE recommends that councils consider supervised toothbrushing and fluoride varnish schemes in nurseries, alongside oral health advice through early years services and schools. NICE Since 2025, a national programme has funded supervised toothbrushing for three to five-year-olds in early years settings in the most deprived areas of England. DHSC

What is happening in Bracknell Forest?

The latest figure for Bracknell Forest comes from the 2022 survey of five-year-olds, shown as 2021/22: the borough didn’t take part in the 2024 survey. OHID How many children see an NHS dentist each year comes from NHS dental statistics. Figures for hospital admissions for tooth decay among young children aren’t published for Bracknell Forest; their pattern across England is under Who is most affected?.

Choose a measure to see its trend and how Bracknell Forest compares.

5 year olds with visible tooth decay

Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay · Persons, 5 yrs · 2021/22

Show the figures in this chart
Area Group Period Sex Age Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Count Denominator Compared with England
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 18.7% 14.3% 24.0% 248 Similar
England England and South East 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 23.7% 23.3% 24.0% 62,649 Not compared
South East England and South East 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 21.2% 20.1% 22.4% 5,043 Better 95%
Reading† Berkshire UAs 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 32.9% 27.9% 38.3% 310 Worse 95%
Slough Berkshire UAs 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 34.9% 29.9% 40.2% 330 Worse 95%
West Berkshire Berkshire UAs 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 16.9% 12.8% 22.1% 247 Better 95%
Windsor and Maidenhead† Berkshire UAs 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 21.0% 16.7% 26.2% 281 Similar
Wokingham† Berkshire UAs 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 12.7% 9.0% 17.4% 242 Better 95%
Bexley Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 20.4% 15.8% 25.7% 252 Similar
Bromley Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 20.2% 15.6% 25.8% 236 Similar
Kingston upon Thames Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 16.3% 12.7% 20.6% 331 Better 95%
Merton Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 26.6% 22.1% 31.5% 338 Similar
Milton Keynes Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 17.8% 13.9% 22.5% 302 Better 95%
Richmond upon Thames Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 16.1% 12.6% 20.3% 355 Better 95%
Solihull Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 16.4% 12.0% 22.0% 209 Better 95%
South Gloucestershire Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 17.4% 12.6% 23.6% 184 Better 95%
Sutton Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 22.3% 18.3% 26.8% 365 Similar
Swindon Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 17.8% 13.3% 23.3% 225 Better 95%
Trafford Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 24.5% 20.1% 29.5% 317 Similar
Warrington Statistical neighbours 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 30.5% 25.7% 35.8% 316 Worse 95%
Show the figures (Bracknell Forest, South East and England)
Area Group Period Sex Age Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Count Denominator Compared with England
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest 2007/08 Persons 5 yrs 30.1% 25.4% 34.8% 374 Similar
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest 2011/12 Persons 5 yrs 27.6% 21.7% 33.5% 215 Similar
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest 2014/15 Persons 5 yrs 22.1% 17.2% 27.0% 264 Similar
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest 2018/19 Persons 5 yrs 11.5% 8.1% 16.0% 255 Better 95%
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 18.7% 14.3% 24.0% 248 Similar
England England and South East 2007/08 Persons 5 yrs 30.9% 30.7% 31.1% 139,727 Not compared
England England and South East 2011/12 Persons 5 yrs 27.9% 27.7% 28.1% 133,516 Not compared
England England and South East 2014/15 Persons 5 yrs 24.7% 24.5% 25.0% 111,500 Not compared
England England and South East 2018/19 Persons 5 yrs 23.4% 23.1% 23.7% 78,767 Not compared
England England and South East 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 23.7% 23.3% 24.0% 62,649 Not compared
South East England and South East 2007/08 Persons 5 yrs 26.2% 25.6% 26.8% 20,048 Better 95%
South East England and South East 2011/12 Persons 5 yrs 21.2% 20.7% 21.7% 21,815 Better 95%
South East England and South East 2014/15 Persons 5 yrs 20.0% 19.4% 20.5% 17,281 Better 95%
South East England and South East 2018/19 Persons 5 yrs 17.6% 16.9% 18.3% 11,644 Better 95%
South East England and South East 2021/22 Persons 5 yrs 21.2% 20.1% 22.4% 5,043 Better 95%
Bracknell Forest 18.7% 95% CI 14.3% to 24.0%
England 23.7% Bracknell Forest is similar
South East 21.2% Bracknell Forest is similar
Count — Not published for this measure

In 2021/22, the figure for Bracknell Forest was 18.7%, about 1 in 5, for children aged 5. This is similar to both England (23.7%) and the South East (21.2%). Any difference could be down to chance.

Between 2007/08 and 2021/22, the figure fell from 30.1% to 18.7%. This change is unlikely to be down to chance, which means it is getting better.

More about this measure
Compared with similar areas

Bracknell Forest was compared with the 15 areas most like it (its MHCLG statistical neighbours). It has the 8th lowest figure of these 16 areas. It is clearly lower than two and similar to the other 13. Among the other areas, figures range from 12.7% in Wokingham to 32.9% in Reading.

Compared with other Berkshire councils

Bracknell Forest was compared with the other five Berkshire unitary authorities. It has the 3rd lowest figure of these six areas. It is clearly lower than two and similar to the other three. Among the other areas, figures range from 12.7% in Wokingham to 34.9% in Slough.

About this measure

Percentage of 5 year olds with observed dental decay extending to the dentine layer. A lower figure is better.

Bear in mind
  • The true figure for 2021/22 is likely to be between 14.3% and 24.0%.
  • No figures were published for ten years between 2007/08 and 2021/22.
  • These are the most recent figures available (2021/22), so they may not reflect the picture today.
  • "Clearly" higher or lower than another area means the ranges of likely values don't overlap. This is a cautious test, so some real differences won't be picked up.

Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93563 (Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, National Dental Epidemiology Programme). Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Children seen by an NHS dentist

NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist · Persons, All ages · March 2026

Show the figures in this chart
Area Group Period Sex Age Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Count Denominator Compared with England
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2026 Persons All ages 58.6% 17,175 29,330 Not compared
England England and South East March 2026 Persons All ages 58.9% 7,171,526 12,183,016 Not compared
Reading† Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 54.4% 20,395 37,515 Not compared
Slough Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 55.3% 24,934 45,094 Not compared
West Berkshire Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 62.0% 21,541 34,769 Not compared
Windsor and Maidenhead† Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 54.5% 18,602 34,119 Not compared
Wokingham† Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 60.4% 26,631 44,073 Not compared
Bexley Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 56.3% 32,332 57,460 Not compared
Bromley Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 57.1% 41,317 72,343 Not compared
Kingston upon Thames Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 56.3% 20,222 35,928 Not compared
Merton Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 47.3% 21,169 44,777 Not compared
Milton Keynes Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 51.4% 37,652 73,234 Not compared
Richmond upon Thames Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 48.3% 20,495 42,448 Not compared
Solihull Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 58.7% 28,669 48,834 Not compared
South Gloucestershire Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 61.9% 38,448 62,146 Not compared
Sutton Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 58.2% 28,837 49,529 Not compared
Swindon Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 58.3% 31,153 53,444 Not compared
Trafford Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 70.0% 39,263 56,073 Not compared
Warrington Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 63.3% 27,702 43,746 Not compared
Show the figures (Bracknell Forest, South East and England)
Area Group Period Sex Age Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Count Denominator Compared with England
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2020 Persons All ages 59.7% 16,310 27,298 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2022 Persons All ages 46.3% 12,871 27,823 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2023 Persons All ages 52.5% 14,845 28,271 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2024 Persons All ages 54.6% 15,647 28,669 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2025 Persons All ages 56.5% 16,436 29,073 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2026 Persons All ages 58.6% 17,175 29,330 Not compared
England England and South East March 2020 Persons All ages 59.5% 7,014,122 11,790,492 Not compared
England England and South East March 2021 Persons All ages 23.4% 2,759,119 11,787,794 Not compared
England England and South East March 2022 Persons All ages 45.9% 5,402,512 11,762,878 Not compared
England England and South East March 2023 Persons All ages 52.8% 6,280,506 11,901,267 Not compared
England England and South East March 2024 Persons All ages 55.1% 6,645,124 12,059,476 Not compared
England England and South East March 2025 Persons All ages 56.9% 6,927,681 12,183,016 Not compared
England England and South East March 2026 Persons All ages 58.9% 7,171,526 12,183,016 Not compared
Bracknell Forest 58.6% No confidence interval published
England 58.9% Bracknell Forest not tested
Count 17,175 out of 29,330

In March 2026, the figure for Bracknell Forest was 58.6%. It is lower than England (58.9%), but NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether the difference is real.

Between March 2022 and March 2026, the figure rose from 46.3% to 58.6%. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether this change is real.

About these figures

This counts NHS dental care only, not children seen privately.

More about this measure
Compared with similar areas

Bracknell Forest was compared with the 15 areas most like it (its MHCLG statistical neighbours). It has the 6th highest figure of these 16 areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 47.3% in Merton to 70.0% in Trafford.

Compared with other Berkshire councils

Bracknell Forest was compared with the other five Berkshire unitary authorities. It has the 3rd highest figure of these six areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 54.4% in Reading to 62.0% in West Berkshire.

About this measure

Of children aged 0 to 17 living in the area, the percentage seen by an NHS dentist in the 12 months to the end of March. A higher figure is better.

Bear in mind
  • It counts NHS dental care only: children seen privately are not included.
  • Children are counted where they live; a child seen more than once counts once.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic cut dental care sharply in 2020 and 2021, so those years are much lower.
  • England is worked out by adding up NHS England regions, including children whose home couldn't be placed; the files have no England row and no ONS regions, so there is no South East figure.
  • NHSBSA publishes no margin of error, so differences are described here but not tested.

Source: NHS Business Services Authority, NHS Dental Statistics for England 2025-26 (official statistics), patients seen by patient location. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Percentages worked out from the published counts. Downloaded 13 October 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Children under 5 seen by an NHS dentist

NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist · Persons, All ages · March 2026

Show the figures in this chart
Area Group Period Sex Age Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Count Denominator Compared with England
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2026 Persons All ages 36.0% 2,612 7,263 Not compared
England England and South East March 2026 Persons All ages 37.3% 1,146,400 3,072,243 Not compared
Reading† Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 27.5% 2,853 10,378 Not compared
Slough Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 30.8% 3,707 12,039 Not compared
West Berkshire Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 40.4% 3,146 7,780 Not compared
Windsor and Maidenhead† Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 33.0% 2,515 7,618 Not compared
Wokingham† Berkshire UAs March 2026 Persons All ages 36.9% 3,441 9,318 Not compared
Bexley Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 34.1% 4,882 14,327 Not compared
Bromley Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 33.5% 6,034 17,993 Not compared
Kingston upon Thames Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 31.1% 2,662 8,561 Not compared
Merton Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 26.1% 3,169 12,164 Not compared
Milton Keynes Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 27.2% 4,828 17,770 Not compared
Richmond upon Thames Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 27.6% 2,591 9,390 Not compared
Solihull Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 37.5% 4,113 10,975 Not compared
South Gloucestershire Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 37.4% 5,846 15,629 Not compared
Sutton Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 33.7% 3,745 11,114 Not compared
Swindon Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 38.8% 5,114 13,191 Not compared
Trafford Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 49.1% 5,927 12,079 Not compared
Warrington Statistical neighbours March 2026 Persons All ages 43.5% 4,303 9,897 Not compared
Show the figures (Bracknell Forest, South East and England)
Area Group Period Sex Age Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Count Denominator Compared with England
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2020 Persons All ages 32.8% 2,342 7,147 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2022 Persons All ages 20.4% 1,453 7,138 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2023 Persons All ages 26.9% 1,974 7,327 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2024 Persons All ages 30.0% 2,184 7,281 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2025 Persons All ages 32.2% 2,350 7,292 Not compared
Bracknell Forest Bracknell Forest March 2026 Persons All ages 36.0% 2,612 7,263 Not compared
England England and South East March 2020 Persons All ages 36.8% 1,178,743 3,205,534 Not compared
England England and South East March 2021 Persons All ages 10.7% 334,882 3,141,148 Not compared
England England and South East March 2022 Persons All ages 24.1% 737,997 3,059,096 Not compared
England England and South East March 2023 Persons All ages 30.3% 928,727 3,066,929 Not compared
England England and South East March 2024 Persons All ages 33.2% 1,021,097 3,079,130 Not compared
England England and South East March 2025 Persons All ages 35.3% 1,085,334 3,072,243 Not compared
England England and South East March 2026 Persons All ages 37.3% 1,146,400 3,072,243 Not compared
Bracknell Forest 36.0% No confidence interval published
England 37.3% Bracknell Forest not tested
Count 2,612 out of 7,263

In March 2026, the figure for Bracknell Forest was 36.0%. It is lower than England (37.3%), but NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether the difference is real.

Between March 2022 and March 2026, the figure rose from 20.4% to 36.0%. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether this change is real.

About these figures

This counts NHS dental care only, not children seen privately.

More about this measure
Compared with similar areas

Bracknell Forest was compared with the 15 areas most like it (its MHCLG statistical neighbours). It has the 7th highest figure of these 16 areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 26.1% in Merton to 49.1% in Trafford.

Compared with other Berkshire councils

Bracknell Forest was compared with the other five Berkshire unitary authorities. It has the 3rd highest figure of these six areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 27.5% in Reading to 40.4% in West Berkshire.

About this measure

Of children aged 0 to 4 living in the area, the percentage seen by an NHS dentist in the 12 months to the end of March. A higher figure is better.

Bear in mind
  • It counts NHS dental care only: children seen privately are not included.
  • Children are counted where they live; a child seen more than once counts once.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic cut dental care sharply in 2020 and 2021, so those years are much lower.
  • England is worked out by adding up NHS England regions, including children whose home couldn't be placed; the files have no England row and no ONS regions, so there is no South East figure.
  • NHSBSA publishes no margin of error, so differences are described here but not tested.

Source: NHS Business Services Authority, NHS Dental Statistics for England 2025-26 (official statistics), patients seen by patient location. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Percentages worked out from the published counts. Downloaded 13 October 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Who is most affected?

Children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much tooth decay as those in the least deprived, and the national survey also looks at differences by ethnic group. OHID OHID No breakdowns are published for Bracknell Forest, so these charts show England’s figures.

Choose a comparison to see how the figure differs between groups of people.

Deprivation: tooth decay at age 5

Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay · Persons, 5 yrs · 2023/24

Show the figures in this chart
Area Sex Decile Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Population Compared with England
England Persons Most deprived decile 35.1% 34.3% 36.0% 11,507 Worse 95%
England Persons Second most deprived decile 28.8% 28.0% 29.7% 10,160 Worse 95%
England Persons Third more deprived decile 28.1% 27.1% 29.0% 8,717 Worse 95%
England Persons Fourth more deprived decile 24.0% 23.1% 25.0% 7,727 Worse 95%
England Persons Fifth more deprived decile 20.6% 19.7% 21.6% 7,330 Better 95%
England Persons Fifth less deprived decile 18.6% 17.7% 19.5% 7,566 Better 95%
England Persons Fourth less deprived decile 17.4% 16.5% 18.3% 7,313 Better 95%
England Persons Third less deprived decile 15.9% 15.1% 16.8% 7,630 Better 95%
England Persons Second least deprived decile 14.1% 13.4% 14.9% 7,662 Better 95%
England Persons Least deprived decile 12.8% 12.0% 13.7% 6,293 Better 95%
England Persons Slope index of inequality (SII) -24.9 -25.9 -23.9

Fingertips doesn't publish this measure by deprivation for Bracknell Forest's own neighbourhoods, so this shows the national picture: England's neighbourhoods grouped into ten by national deprivation (IMD 2019). In 2023/24, the figure was 35.1% in the most deprived tenth and 12.8% in the least deprived tenth. Taking every group into account, the slope index of inequality puts the gap between the most and least deprived ends at 24.9 percentage points, with the figure higher at the most deprived end (likely range 23.9 to 25.9 percentage points). This is unlikely to be down to chance. This shows how the measure varies with deprivation across England; it doesn't describe inequality within Bracknell Forest.

Bear in mind
  • The slope index of inequality uses every group, not just the two ends: a line is fitted across them, with each group placed by its share of the population, as OHID calculates it.
  • These are the most recent figures published by deprivation (2023/24), so they may not reflect the picture today.

Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93563. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Tooth decay at age 5: ethnic group

Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay · Persons, 5 yrs · 2023/24

Show the figures in this chart
Group Period England Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI
Asian or Asian British 2023/24 37.7% 36.7% 38.6%
Black or Black British 2023/24 20.4% 19.2% 21.6%
Mixed or multiple ethnic groups 2023/24 20.9% 19.7% 22.1%
White 2023/24 19.5% 19.2% 19.8%
Other ethnic group 2023/24 45.4% 43.0% 47.8%

Fingertips doesn't publish this breakdown for Bracknell Forest, so this shows the national picture: England's figures for each group. It doesn't describe Bracknell Forest. In 2023/24, the figure for England was highest for other ethnic group (45.4%) and lowest for White (19.5%). The ranges of likely values for these two groups don't overlap, so the difference is unlikely to be down to chance.

Bear in mind
  • These are the most recent figures available (2023/24), so they may not reflect the picture today.
  • The thin lines on the chart show each group's range of likely values (95% confidence interval). Where two ranges overlap, the difference between those groups could be down to chance. This is a cautious test, so some real differences won't be picked up.

Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93563. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Deprivation: hospital admissions for tooth decay (0 to 5)

Hospital admissions for dental caries (0 to 5 years) · Persons, 0-5 yrs · 2022/23 - 24/25

Show the figures in this chart
Area Sex Decile Value Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Population Compared with England
England Persons Most deprived decile (IMD2025) 266.7 257.8 276.1 1,233,670 Higher 95%
England Persons Second most deprived decile (IMD2025) 291.2 279.4 302.9 815,630 Higher 95%
England Persons Third more deprived decile (IMD2025) 409.3 396.5 422.8 916,297 Higher 95%
England Persons Fourth more deprived decile (IMD2025) 314.8 302.5 327.6 775,011 Higher 95%
England Persons Fifth more deprived decile (IMD2025) 270.3 260.5 280.8 1,024,788 Higher 95%
England Persons Fifth less deprived decile (IMD2025) 161.5 154.6 168.4 1,325,148 Lower 95%
England Persons Fourth less deprived decile (IMD2025) 135.4 128.8 142.4 1,140,890 Lower 95%
England Persons Third less deprived decile (IMD2025) 143.6 137.3 150.1 1,365,298 Lower 95%
England Persons Second least deprived decile (IMD2025) 128.3 122.5 134.3 1,441,867 Lower 95%
England Persons Least deprived decile (IMD2025) 135.1 128.4 142.0 1,143,883 Lower 95%
England Persons Slope index of inequality (SII) -252.1 -261.5 -242.6

Fingertips doesn't publish this measure by deprivation for Bracknell Forest's own neighbourhoods, so this shows the national picture: England's county and unitary councils grouped into ten by deprivation (IMD 2025). In 2022/23 - 24/25, the figure was 267 per 100,000 in the most deprived tenth and 135 per 100,000 in the least deprived tenth. Taking every group into account, the slope index of inequality puts the gap between the most and least deprived ends at 252 per 100,000, with the figure higher at the most deprived end (likely range 243 to 262 per 100,000). This is unlikely to be down to chance. This shows how the measure varies with deprivation across England; it doesn't describe inequality within Bracknell Forest.

Bear in mind
  • The slope index of inequality uses every group, not just the two ends: a line is fitted across them, with each group placed by its share of the population, as OHID calculates it.
  • Councils are grouped by how deprived they are overall, so this compares whole council areas, not neighbourhoods.

Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93479. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Where is need greatest?

By local area

No figures for children’s oral health are published for areas smaller than the council. These maps show where children live, and where more of them live in income-deprived families, which is linked to more tooth decay. Neither measures oral health.

Choose a measure to see how it varies across Bracknell Forest.

Children in income-deprived families

English Indices of Deprivation 2025, by MSOA · prepared by Just Knowledge · 15 local areas (MSOAs)

Show the figures for each area
Area Code Decile Rank in England (of 6,856) Percentage
Priestwood E02003355 5 3,371 31.5%
Bullbrook E02003357 6 3,755 28.9%
Central Bracknell & Wildridings E02003358 6 3,863 28.2%
Hanworth West E02003362 7 4,379 24.9%
Great Hollands E02003360 7 4,460 24.4%
Birch Hill & Hanworth East E02003361 7 4,764 22.4%
Crown Wood E02003359 8 5,102 20.5%
Owlsmoor & Broadmoor E02003364 9 5,764 16.7%
Wick Hill E02003354 9 6,017 14.8%
College Town E02003366 9 6,146 14.0%
Binfield & Popeswood E02003353 10 6,178 13.8%
Sandhurst E02003365 10 6,440 11.5%
Chavey Down & North Ascot West E02003356 10 6,664 9.0%
Crowthorne South E02003363 10 6,740 7.6%
Winkfield & Cranbourne E02003352 10 6,805 6.1%
Most deprived local area Decile 5 Priestwood
Least deprived local area Decile 10 Winkfield & Cranbourne
In England's most deprived 20% 0 of 15 local areas in deciles 1 and 2
In England's least deprived 20% 8 of 15 local areas in deciles 9 and 10

In 2025, Bracknell Forest's 15 local areas (MSOAs) ranged from decile 5 to decile 10 for income deprivation affecting children. Decile 1 is the most deprived 10% of England's 6,856 local areas, and decile 10 the least deprived 10%. The most deprived was Priestwood, the 3,371st most deprived in England. None of the borough's local areas were among the most deprived 20% in England (deciles 1 and 2), and eight were among the least deprived 20% (deciles 9 and 10). 31.5% of children aged 0 to 15 in Priestwood lived in income-deprived families, against 6.1% in Winkfield & Cranbourne.

From England’s official measure of deprivation, 2025. Children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much tooth decay as those in the least deprived. GOV.UK OHID

More about this measure
About this measure

The share of children aged 0 to 15 living in income-deprived families (the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index).

About the figures

The Indices of Deprivation rank every small area in England from most to least deprived. They combine 55 measures in seven areas of life: income, employment, education and skills, health and disability, crime, barriers to housing and services, and the living environment. MHCLG publishes them for neighbourhoods (LSOAs). Just Knowledge combined the neighbourhoods into local areas (MSOAs), giving each one a weight for the number of people living there.

Bear in mind
  • The indices compare areas with each other. A decile shows where an area ranks in England, not how deprived it is: an area ranked 100th is more deprived than one ranked 200th, but not twice as deprived.
  • They describe areas, not people. Not everyone in a deprived area is deprived, and many people on low incomes live in less deprived areas.
  • A local area's figure is an average of its smaller neighbourhoods, so it can hide pockets of deprivation inside it.
  • The 2025 indices can't be compared with the 2019 ones. MHCLG changed the measures and data behind them, for example to count people on Universal Credit, so the figures are not a time series.
  • Local area names are the House of Commons Library's names for MSOAs.

Source: English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (MHCLG), aggregated to MSOA by Just Knowledge. Boundaries: Office for National Statistics, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025. MSOA names: House of Commons Library. Downloaded 2 October 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

Children aged 0 to 15

OHID Fingertips · indicator 93084 · 15 local areas (MSOAs)

Show the figures for each area
Area Code Counted Out of Percentage
Great Hollands E02003360 2,750 11,977 23.0%
Binfield & Popeswood E02003353 3,200 14,283 22.4%
Priestwood E02003355 1,604 7,435 21.6%
Bullbrook E02003357 2,281 10,775 21.2%
Hanworth West E02003362 1,387 6,575 21.1%
Central Bracknell & Wildridings E02003358 2,591 13,113 19.8%
Birch Hill & Hanworth East E02003361 1,471 7,479 19.7%
Chavey Down & North Ascot West E02003356 1,415 7,419 19.1%
Wick Hill E02003354 1,967 10,499 18.7%
Sandhurst E02003365 1,264 6,868 18.4%
Owlsmoor & Broadmoor E02003364 1,378 7,519 18.3%
Crowthorne South E02003363 1,342 7,464 18.0%
Crown Wood E02003359 1,119 6,325 17.7%
College Town E02003366 1,161 7,257 16.0%
Winkfield & Cranbourne E02003352 829 5,818 14.2%
Bracknell Forest 19.7% 25,759 of 130,806
England 18.4% Not compared
Highest area 23.0% Great Hollands
Lowest area 14.2% Winkfield & Cranbourne

In 2024, 19.7% of residents in Bracknell Forest were aged 0 to 15 (25,759 of 130,806). The figure for England was 18.4%. Across the borough's 15 local areas (MSOAs), it ranged from 14.2% in Winkfield & Cranbourne to 23.0% in Great Hollands. The highest figure was about 1.6 times the lowest.

From ONS’s population estimates. It shows where children live, for context.

More about this measure
About this measure

Population aged under 16 as a percentage of total population.

Bear in mind
  • "Better" or "worse" than England is Fingertips' own comparison, using each area's range of likely values (95% confidence interval). It is a cautious test, so some real differences won't be picked up.
  • Local area names are the House of Commons Library's names for MSOAs.

Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93084 (Office for National Statistics), for MSOAs. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.

By neighbourhood

We have grouped Bracknell Forest’s 15 local areas (MSOAs, the areas on the maps above) into three neighbourhoods: North, Central and South. Each local area sits in the neighbourhood where most of its residents live, and a neighbourhood’s figures are calculated from its local areas’ published figures. Hover over or tap a row for its details.

Children aged 0 to 15mid-2024 · ONS small area population estimates
North19.2%
Central21.1%
South17.7%
England18.4%

Highest in Central, lowest in South (not tested)

Census and ONS population figures come with no margin of error, so they aren’t tested.

Neighbourhood profiles

The charts above show this topic in each of the three neighbourhoods. The neighbourhood profiles turn this round. Each one shows every measure we have for one neighbourhood, across all the topics, from the same data. Use them to see where a neighbourhood is better or worse than the Bracknell Forest average, and which of its local areas stand out.

What don’t we know?

Coming soon

This section will set out what we don't yet know about oral health in children in Bracknell Forest, so the gaps in the evidence are clear.

It might include:

  • figures we don't have for smaller areas, or for some groups of people
  • figures that are out of date, or only collected every few years
  • questions that local figures can't answer yet

We'll add this as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment grows. Please check back later.

So what does this mean for Bracknell Forest?

Coming soon

This section will bring together what this page shows about oral health in children, and what it means for Bracknell Forest.

It might include:

  • the main points from the figures on this page
  • how things are changing, and who is most affected
  • where in the borough need is greatest

We'll add this as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment grows. Please check back later.

Understanding it and responding

What lies behind the figures, what could make a difference, and what local people and services tell us.

What might be driving this?

Tooth decay is largely preventable, and the main things that make it more likely are well known. OHID

  • Sugary food and drinks, often: having sugar regularly raises the risk of decay. Children still have more sugar than is recommended. OHID
  • Toothbrushing: brushing less than twice a day, or without fluoride toothpaste. NHS
  • Deprivation: children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much decay as those in the least deprived. OHID
  • Getting to a dentist: regular checks and preventive care such as fluoride varnish help, and children at higher risk need more of them. DHSC and NHS England

More on children’s diet and weight is on Childhood healthy weight and physical activity, and on the early years on Early years and school readiness.

What could help?

What the evidence recommends

  • Brushing twice a day with fluoride toothpaste from the first tooth, last thing at night and at one other time, with a smear of toothpaste for under-threes and a pea-sized amount from three to six, spitting out rather than rinsing. NHS
  • Having sugary food and drinks less often, and regular dental care, with extra preventive care, such as fluoride varnish, for children at higher risk. DHSC and NHS England
  • Oral health as a local priority: an oral health needs assessment and strategy, oral health advice through all early years services, more tailored advice for groups at high risk, and a whole-school approach in primary schools. NICE
  • Supervised toothbrushing and fluoride varnish schemes in nurseries in areas where children are at high risk of poor oral health. NICE The national supervised toothbrushing programme supports councils to offer toothbrushing in early years settings in the most deprived areas, with free toothbrushes and toothpaste. DHSC
  • Every contact counts: health and care professionals can give brief advice on toothbrushing and sugar, and point families to dental care and local oral health programmes. OHID

What do people tell us?

Coming soon

This section will share what local people, and the people who support them, tell us about oral health in children.

It might include:

  • people's own experiences, in their own words
  • what community and voluntary groups hear
  • what staff who work with local people notice

We'll add this as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment grows. Please check back later.

Further information

Where to find out more, and where the figures on this page come from.

Want to find out more?

Guidance, evidence and useful links

Guidance, research, statistics and where to get help, from trusted organisations.

Show 2 more

Where these figures come from

Most figures on this page come from OHID Fingertips and are refreshed from source. Two files were downloaded from their publishers' websites, because their figures aren't available from those services: English Indices of Deprivation 2025, by MSOA and NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist. They are checked each time the page is built, and replaced when a new version is published.

Measure What it measures Source Data covers Updated at source
5 year olds with visible tooth decay Percentage of 5 year olds with observed dental decay extending to the dentine layer Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, National Dental… 2007/08 to 2023/24 2 April 2025
Hospital admissions for tooth decay (0 to 5) Finished consultant episodes for dental caries among children aged 0 to 5, rate per 100,000 OHID, based on NHS England and Office for National Statistics data 2015/16 - 17/18 to 2022/23 - 24/25 11 September 2026
Children aged 0 to 15 Population aged under 16 as a percentage of total population Office for National Statistics 2024, by MSOA 16 October 2026
English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (local areas) How deprived each local area is compared with the rest of England, overall and in seven areas of life Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, prepared by Just Knowledge 2025, by MSOA 30 October 2025
NHS Dental Statistics: children seen (NHSBSA) Children seen by an NHS dentist in the previous 12 months, for every council, each March NHS Business Services Authority March 2020 to March 2026, by council 27 August 2026
Definitions and limitations
5 year olds with visible tooth decay Indicator 93563

Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay

Percentage of 5 year olds with dental decay extending to the dentine layer which can be detected by visual observation alone

Limitations. Not all local authorities have taken part in the survey. This means that for any child who has been examined whose LA of residence has not taken part in the survey, their figures will be included in national, regional, deprivation and ethnicity breakdowns, but will not appear in the local authority breakdown.

Collected in Dental Public Health Epidemiology Programme for England: oral health survey of five year… · Published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, National Dental Epidemiology Programme · Updated biennial · Last updated on Fingertips 2 April 2025

Hospital admissions for tooth decay (0 to 5) Indicator 93479

Hospital admissions for dental caries (0 to 5 years)

Finished consultant episodes for dental caries among children aged 0 to 5, rate per 100,000.

Limitations. Areas where between 1% and 10% of records had missing sex values have been flagged and should be interpreted with caution. In some instances the data are an underestimate of the number of episodes, as the Community Dental Service may provide the extraction service in hospital premises but the episodes may not be…

Collected in Population Health Analysis, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities · Published by OHID, based on NHS England and Office for National Statistics data · Updated annual · Last updated on Fingertips 11 September 2026

Children aged 0 to 15 Indicator 93084

Resident population (aged 0 to 15)

Population aged under 16 as a percentage of total population.

Collected in Office for National Statistics (ONS), Mid year population estimates · Published by Office for National Statistics · Updated annual · Last updated on Fingertips 16 October 2026

English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (local areas) Source

English Indices of Deprivation 2025, by MSOA

The Indices of Deprivation rank every small area in England from most to least deprived. They combine 55 measures in seven areas of life: income, employment, education and skills, health and disability, crime, barriers to housing and services, and the living environment. MHCLG publishes them for neighbourhoods (LSOAs). Just Knowledge combined the neighbourhoods into local areas (MSOAs), giving each one a weight for the number of people living there.

Limitations. The indices compare areas with each other. A decile shows where an area ranks in England, not how deprived it is: an area ranked 100th is more deprived than one ranked 200th, but not twice as deprived. They describe areas, not people. Not everyone in a deprived area is deprived, and many people on low incomes live in less deprived areas. A local area's figure is an average of its smaller neighbourhoods, so it can hide pockets of deprivation inside it. The 2025 indices can't be compared with the 2019 ones. MHCLG changed the measures and data behind them, for example to count people on Universal Credit, so the figures are not a time series.

Published by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on 30 October 2025 · Prepared by Just Knowledge · Downloaded on 2 October 2026 · Next update: not yet known
Credit: English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (MHCLG), aggregated to MSOA by Just Knowledge. Boundaries: Office for National Statistics, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025. MSOA names: House of Commons Library.

NHS Dental Statistics: children seen (NHSBSA) Source

NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist

NHS dental practices record every course of treatment they give. The NHS Business Services Authority counts how many children aged 0 to 17 were seen by an NHS dentist in the 12 months to the end of each month, by where they live, beside ONS population estimates for the same ages.

Limitations. It counts NHS dental care only: children seen privately are not included. Children are counted where they live; a child seen more than once counts once. The COVID-19 pandemic cut dental care sharply in 2020 and 2021, so those years are much lower. England is worked out by adding up NHS England regions, including children whose home couldn't be placed; the files have no England row and no ONS regions, so there is no South East figure. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error, so differences are described here but not tested.

Published by NHS Business Services Authority on 27 August 2026 · Downloaded on 13 October 2026 · Next update: not yet known
Credit: NHS Business Services Authority, NHS Dental Statistics for England 2025-26 (official statistics), patients seen by patient location. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Page built 10 November 2026, 15:14 Data downloaded 10 November 2026, 11:42 Other files downloaded 13 October 2026 3 indicators from OHID Fingertips and 2 files from publishers' websites