Child oral health: applying All Our Health (opens in a new tab)
Why children's oral health matters, who is most affected, and what health and care professionals can do to prevent tooth decay.
This topic is about the health of children’s teeth and mouths, and above all tooth decay, which is largely preventable. It covers how common decay is, which children are most affected, and what helps prevent it.
This page looks at tooth decay among five-year-olds in Bracknell Forest, how it differs between groups of children across England, and what helps prevent it.
What the evidence shows locally: the scale of need, who it affects most and where it is greatest.
Good oral health is part of children’s general health and wellbeing, and of their development and readiness for school. Tooth decay is the most common oral disease affecting children and young people in England, yet it is largely preventable. It can cause pain and infection, and affect eating, sleeping, communication and socialising, and children miss school days for hospital treatment to remove decayed teeth. OHID Regularly having sugary food and drinks raises the risk of decay, as well as of obesity and type 2 diabetes. OHID
Oral health isn’t equal. Children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much tooth decay as those in the least deprived. OHID The national survey of five-year-olds shows differences between areas in both how many children have decay and how many teeth are affected, and exists to help councils, the NHS and partners understand their children’s oral health and highlight inequalities. OHID
Prevention starts early: brushing twice a day with fluoride toothpaste from the first tooth, having sugary food and drinks less often, and regular dental visits. NHS DHSC and NHS England For children at higher risk, NICE recommends that councils consider supervised toothbrushing and fluoride varnish schemes in nurseries, alongside oral health advice through early years services and schools. NICE Since 2025, a national programme has funded supervised toothbrushing for three to five-year-olds in early years settings in the most deprived areas of England. DHSC
The latest figure for Bracknell Forest comes from the 2022 survey of five-year-olds, shown as 2021/22: the borough didn’t take part in the 2024 survey. OHID How many children see an NHS dentist each year comes from NHS dental statistics. Figures for hospital admissions for tooth decay among young children aren’t published for Bracknell Forest; their pattern across England is under Who is most affected?.
Choose a measure to see its trend and how Bracknell Forest compares.
Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay · Persons, 5 yrs · 2021/22
| Area | Group | Period | Sex | Age | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Count | Denominator | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 18.7% | 14.3% | 24.0% | 248 | Similar | |
| England | England and South East | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 23.7% | 23.3% | 24.0% | 62,649 | Not compared | |
| South East | England and South East | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 21.2% | 20.1% | 22.4% | 5,043 | Better 95% | |
| Reading† | Berkshire UAs | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 32.9% | 27.9% | 38.3% | 310 | Worse 95% | |
| Slough | Berkshire UAs | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 34.9% | 29.9% | 40.2% | 330 | Worse 95% | |
| West Berkshire | Berkshire UAs | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 16.9% | 12.8% | 22.1% | 247 | Better 95% | |
| Windsor and Maidenhead† | Berkshire UAs | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 21.0% | 16.7% | 26.2% | 281 | Similar | |
| Wokingham† | Berkshire UAs | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 12.7% | 9.0% | 17.4% | 242 | Better 95% | |
| Bexley | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 20.4% | 15.8% | 25.7% | 252 | Similar | |
| Bromley | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 20.2% | 15.6% | 25.8% | 236 | Similar | |
| Kingston upon Thames | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 16.3% | 12.7% | 20.6% | 331 | Better 95% | |
| Merton | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 26.6% | 22.1% | 31.5% | 338 | Similar | |
| Milton Keynes | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 17.8% | 13.9% | 22.5% | 302 | Better 95% | |
| Richmond upon Thames | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 16.1% | 12.6% | 20.3% | 355 | Better 95% | |
| Solihull | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 16.4% | 12.0% | 22.0% | 209 | Better 95% | |
| South Gloucestershire | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 17.4% | 12.6% | 23.6% | 184 | Better 95% | |
| Sutton | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 22.3% | 18.3% | 26.8% | 365 | Similar | |
| Swindon | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 17.8% | 13.3% | 23.3% | 225 | Better 95% | |
| Trafford | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 24.5% | 20.1% | 29.5% | 317 | Similar | |
| Warrington | Statistical neighbours | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 30.5% | 25.7% | 35.8% | 316 | Worse 95% |
| Area | Group | Period | Sex | Age | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Count | Denominator | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | 2007/08 | Persons | 5 yrs | 30.1% | 25.4% | 34.8% | 374 | Similar | |
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | 2011/12 | Persons | 5 yrs | 27.6% | 21.7% | 33.5% | 215 | Similar | |
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | 2014/15 | Persons | 5 yrs | 22.1% | 17.2% | 27.0% | 264 | Similar | |
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | 2018/19 | Persons | 5 yrs | 11.5% | 8.1% | 16.0% | 255 | Better 95% | |
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 18.7% | 14.3% | 24.0% | 248 | Similar | |
| England | England and South East | 2007/08 | Persons | 5 yrs | 30.9% | 30.7% | 31.1% | 139,727 | Not compared | |
| England | England and South East | 2011/12 | Persons | 5 yrs | 27.9% | 27.7% | 28.1% | 133,516 | Not compared | |
| England | England and South East | 2014/15 | Persons | 5 yrs | 24.7% | 24.5% | 25.0% | 111,500 | Not compared | |
| England | England and South East | 2018/19 | Persons | 5 yrs | 23.4% | 23.1% | 23.7% | 78,767 | Not compared | |
| England | England and South East | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 23.7% | 23.3% | 24.0% | 62,649 | Not compared | |
| South East | England and South East | 2007/08 | Persons | 5 yrs | 26.2% | 25.6% | 26.8% | 20,048 | Better 95% | |
| South East | England and South East | 2011/12 | Persons | 5 yrs | 21.2% | 20.7% | 21.7% | 21,815 | Better 95% | |
| South East | England and South East | 2014/15 | Persons | 5 yrs | 20.0% | 19.4% | 20.5% | 17,281 | Better 95% | |
| South East | England and South East | 2018/19 | Persons | 5 yrs | 17.6% | 16.9% | 18.3% | 11,644 | Better 95% | |
| South East | England and South East | 2021/22 | Persons | 5 yrs | 21.2% | 20.1% | 22.4% | 5,043 | Better 95% |
In 2021/22, the figure for Bracknell Forest was 18.7%, about 1 in 5, for children aged 5. This is similar to both England (23.7%) and the South East (21.2%). Any difference could be down to chance.
Between 2007/08 and 2021/22, the figure fell from 30.1% to 18.7%. This change is unlikely to be down to chance, which means it is getting better.
Bracknell Forest was compared with the 15 areas most like it (its MHCLG statistical neighbours). It has the 8th lowest figure of these 16 areas. It is clearly lower than two and similar to the other 13. Among the other areas, figures range from 12.7% in Wokingham to 32.9% in Reading.
Bracknell Forest was compared with the other five Berkshire unitary authorities. It has the 3rd lowest figure of these six areas. It is clearly lower than two and similar to the other three. Among the other areas, figures range from 12.7% in Wokingham to 34.9% in Slough.
Percentage of 5 year olds with observed dental decay extending to the dentine layer. A lower figure is better.
Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93563 (Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, National Dental Epidemiology Programme). Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist · Persons, All ages · March 2026
| Area | Group | Period | Sex | Age | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Count | Denominator | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.6% | 17,175 | 29,330 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.9% | 7,171,526 | 12,183,016 | Not compared | ||
| Reading† | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 54.4% | 20,395 | 37,515 | Not compared | ||
| Slough | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 55.3% | 24,934 | 45,094 | Not compared | ||
| West Berkshire | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 62.0% | 21,541 | 34,769 | Not compared | ||
| Windsor and Maidenhead† | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 54.5% | 18,602 | 34,119 | Not compared | ||
| Wokingham† | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 60.4% | 26,631 | 44,073 | Not compared | ||
| Bexley | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 56.3% | 32,332 | 57,460 | Not compared | ||
| Bromley | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 57.1% | 41,317 | 72,343 | Not compared | ||
| Kingston upon Thames | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 56.3% | 20,222 | 35,928 | Not compared | ||
| Merton | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 47.3% | 21,169 | 44,777 | Not compared | ||
| Milton Keynes | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 51.4% | 37,652 | 73,234 | Not compared | ||
| Richmond upon Thames | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 48.3% | 20,495 | 42,448 | Not compared | ||
| Solihull | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.7% | 28,669 | 48,834 | Not compared | ||
| South Gloucestershire | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 61.9% | 38,448 | 62,146 | Not compared | ||
| Sutton | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.2% | 28,837 | 49,529 | Not compared | ||
| Swindon | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.3% | 31,153 | 53,444 | Not compared | ||
| Trafford | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 70.0% | 39,263 | 56,073 | Not compared | ||
| Warrington | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 63.3% | 27,702 | 43,746 | Not compared |
| Area | Group | Period | Sex | Age | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Count | Denominator | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2020 | Persons | All ages | 59.7% | 16,310 | 27,298 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2022 | Persons | All ages | 46.3% | 12,871 | 27,823 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2023 | Persons | All ages | 52.5% | 14,845 | 28,271 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2024 | Persons | All ages | 54.6% | 15,647 | 28,669 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2025 | Persons | All ages | 56.5% | 16,436 | 29,073 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.6% | 17,175 | 29,330 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2020 | Persons | All ages | 59.5% | 7,014,122 | 11,790,492 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2021 | Persons | All ages | 23.4% | 2,759,119 | 11,787,794 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2022 | Persons | All ages | 45.9% | 5,402,512 | 11,762,878 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2023 | Persons | All ages | 52.8% | 6,280,506 | 11,901,267 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2024 | Persons | All ages | 55.1% | 6,645,124 | 12,059,476 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2025 | Persons | All ages | 56.9% | 6,927,681 | 12,183,016 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 58.9% | 7,171,526 | 12,183,016 | Not compared |
In March 2026, the figure for Bracknell Forest was 58.6%. It is lower than England (58.9%), but NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether the difference is real.
Between March 2022 and March 2026, the figure rose from 46.3% to 58.6%. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether this change is real.
About these figures
This counts NHS dental care only, not children seen privately.
Bracknell Forest was compared with the 15 areas most like it (its MHCLG statistical neighbours). It has the 6th highest figure of these 16 areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 47.3% in Merton to 70.0% in Trafford.
Bracknell Forest was compared with the other five Berkshire unitary authorities. It has the 3rd highest figure of these six areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 54.4% in Reading to 62.0% in West Berkshire.
Of children aged 0 to 17 living in the area, the percentage seen by an NHS dentist in the 12 months to the end of March. A higher figure is better.
Source: NHS Business Services Authority, NHS Dental Statistics for England 2025-26 (official statistics), patients seen by patient location. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Percentages worked out from the published counts. Downloaded 13 October 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist · Persons, All ages · March 2026
| Area | Group | Period | Sex | Age | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Count | Denominator | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 36.0% | 2,612 | 7,263 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 37.3% | 1,146,400 | 3,072,243 | Not compared | ||
| Reading† | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 27.5% | 2,853 | 10,378 | Not compared | ||
| Slough | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 30.8% | 3,707 | 12,039 | Not compared | ||
| West Berkshire | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 40.4% | 3,146 | 7,780 | Not compared | ||
| Windsor and Maidenhead† | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 33.0% | 2,515 | 7,618 | Not compared | ||
| Wokingham† | Berkshire UAs | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 36.9% | 3,441 | 9,318 | Not compared | ||
| Bexley | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 34.1% | 4,882 | 14,327 | Not compared | ||
| Bromley | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 33.5% | 6,034 | 17,993 | Not compared | ||
| Kingston upon Thames | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 31.1% | 2,662 | 8,561 | Not compared | ||
| Merton | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 26.1% | 3,169 | 12,164 | Not compared | ||
| Milton Keynes | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 27.2% | 4,828 | 17,770 | Not compared | ||
| Richmond upon Thames | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 27.6% | 2,591 | 9,390 | Not compared | ||
| Solihull | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 37.5% | 4,113 | 10,975 | Not compared | ||
| South Gloucestershire | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 37.4% | 5,846 | 15,629 | Not compared | ||
| Sutton | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 33.7% | 3,745 | 11,114 | Not compared | ||
| Swindon | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 38.8% | 5,114 | 13,191 | Not compared | ||
| Trafford | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 49.1% | 5,927 | 12,079 | Not compared | ||
| Warrington | Statistical neighbours | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 43.5% | 4,303 | 9,897 | Not compared |
| Area | Group | Period | Sex | Age | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Count | Denominator | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2020 | Persons | All ages | 32.8% | 2,342 | 7,147 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2022 | Persons | All ages | 20.4% | 1,453 | 7,138 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2023 | Persons | All ages | 26.9% | 1,974 | 7,327 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2024 | Persons | All ages | 30.0% | 2,184 | 7,281 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2025 | Persons | All ages | 32.2% | 2,350 | 7,292 | Not compared | ||
| Bracknell Forest | Bracknell Forest | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 36.0% | 2,612 | 7,263 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2020 | Persons | All ages | 36.8% | 1,178,743 | 3,205,534 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2021 | Persons | All ages | 10.7% | 334,882 | 3,141,148 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2022 | Persons | All ages | 24.1% | 737,997 | 3,059,096 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2023 | Persons | All ages | 30.3% | 928,727 | 3,066,929 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2024 | Persons | All ages | 33.2% | 1,021,097 | 3,079,130 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2025 | Persons | All ages | 35.3% | 1,085,334 | 3,072,243 | Not compared | ||
| England | England and South East | March 2026 | Persons | All ages | 37.3% | 1,146,400 | 3,072,243 | Not compared |
In March 2026, the figure for Bracknell Forest was 36.0%. It is lower than England (37.3%), but NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether the difference is real.
Between March 2022 and March 2026, the figure rose from 20.4% to 36.0%. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether this change is real.
About these figures
This counts NHS dental care only, not children seen privately.
Bracknell Forest was compared with the 15 areas most like it (its MHCLG statistical neighbours). It has the 7th highest figure of these 16 areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 26.1% in Merton to 49.1% in Trafford.
Bracknell Forest was compared with the other five Berkshire unitary authorities. It has the 3rd highest figure of these six areas. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error to test whether it is clearly different from any of them. Among the other areas, figures range from 27.5% in Reading to 40.4% in West Berkshire.
Of children aged 0 to 4 living in the area, the percentage seen by an NHS dentist in the 12 months to the end of March. A higher figure is better.
Source: NHS Business Services Authority, NHS Dental Statistics for England 2025-26 (official statistics), patients seen by patient location. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Percentages worked out from the published counts. Downloaded 13 October 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
Children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much tooth decay as those in the least deprived, and the national survey also looks at differences by ethnic group. OHID OHID No breakdowns are published for Bracknell Forest, so these charts show England’s figures.
Choose a comparison to see how the figure differs between groups of people.
Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay · Persons, 5 yrs · 2023/24
| Area | Sex | Decile | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Population | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | Persons | Most deprived decile | 35.1% | 34.3% | 36.0% | 11,507 | Worse 95% |
| England | Persons | Second most deprived decile | 28.8% | 28.0% | 29.7% | 10,160 | Worse 95% |
| England | Persons | Third more deprived decile | 28.1% | 27.1% | 29.0% | 8,717 | Worse 95% |
| England | Persons | Fourth more deprived decile | 24.0% | 23.1% | 25.0% | 7,727 | Worse 95% |
| England | Persons | Fifth more deprived decile | 20.6% | 19.7% | 21.6% | 7,330 | Better 95% |
| England | Persons | Fifth less deprived decile | 18.6% | 17.7% | 19.5% | 7,566 | Better 95% |
| England | Persons | Fourth less deprived decile | 17.4% | 16.5% | 18.3% | 7,313 | Better 95% |
| England | Persons | Third less deprived decile | 15.9% | 15.1% | 16.8% | 7,630 | Better 95% |
| England | Persons | Second least deprived decile | 14.1% | 13.4% | 14.9% | 7,662 | Better 95% |
| England | Persons | Least deprived decile | 12.8% | 12.0% | 13.7% | 6,293 | Better 95% |
| England | Persons | Slope index of inequality (SII) | -24.9 | -25.9 | -23.9 |
Fingertips doesn't publish this measure by deprivation for Bracknell Forest's own neighbourhoods, so this shows the national picture: England's neighbourhoods grouped into ten by national deprivation (IMD 2019). In 2023/24, the figure was 35.1% in the most deprived tenth and 12.8% in the least deprived tenth. Taking every group into account, the slope index of inequality puts the gap between the most and least deprived ends at 24.9 percentage points, with the figure higher at the most deprived end (likely range 23.9 to 25.9 percentage points). This is unlikely to be down to chance. This shows how the measure varies with deprivation across England; it doesn't describe inequality within Bracknell Forest.
Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93563. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay · Persons, 5 yrs · 2023/24
| Group | Period | England | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asian or Asian British | 2023/24 | 37.7% | 36.7% | 38.6% |
| Black or Black British | 2023/24 | 20.4% | 19.2% | 21.6% |
| Mixed or multiple ethnic groups | 2023/24 | 20.9% | 19.7% | 22.1% |
| White | 2023/24 | 19.5% | 19.2% | 19.8% |
| Other ethnic group | 2023/24 | 45.4% | 43.0% | 47.8% |
Fingertips doesn't publish this breakdown for Bracknell Forest, so this shows the national picture: England's figures for each group. It doesn't describe Bracknell Forest. In 2023/24, the figure for England was highest for other ethnic group (45.4%) and lowest for White (19.5%). The ranges of likely values for these two groups don't overlap, so the difference is unlikely to be down to chance.
Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93563. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
Hospital admissions for dental caries (0 to 5 years) · Persons, 0-5 yrs · 2022/23 - 24/25
| Area | Sex | Decile | Value | Lower 95% CI | Upper 95% CI | Population | Compared with England |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| England | Persons | Most deprived decile (IMD2025) | 266.7 | 257.8 | 276.1 | 1,233,670 | Higher 95% |
| England | Persons | Second most deprived decile (IMD2025) | 291.2 | 279.4 | 302.9 | 815,630 | Higher 95% |
| England | Persons | Third more deprived decile (IMD2025) | 409.3 | 396.5 | 422.8 | 916,297 | Higher 95% |
| England | Persons | Fourth more deprived decile (IMD2025) | 314.8 | 302.5 | 327.6 | 775,011 | Higher 95% |
| England | Persons | Fifth more deprived decile (IMD2025) | 270.3 | 260.5 | 280.8 | 1,024,788 | Higher 95% |
| England | Persons | Fifth less deprived decile (IMD2025) | 161.5 | 154.6 | 168.4 | 1,325,148 | Lower 95% |
| England | Persons | Fourth less deprived decile (IMD2025) | 135.4 | 128.8 | 142.4 | 1,140,890 | Lower 95% |
| England | Persons | Third less deprived decile (IMD2025) | 143.6 | 137.3 | 150.1 | 1,365,298 | Lower 95% |
| England | Persons | Second least deprived decile (IMD2025) | 128.3 | 122.5 | 134.3 | 1,441,867 | Lower 95% |
| England | Persons | Least deprived decile (IMD2025) | 135.1 | 128.4 | 142.0 | 1,143,883 | Lower 95% |
| England | Persons | Slope index of inequality (SII) | -252.1 | -261.5 | -242.6 |
Fingertips doesn't publish this measure by deprivation for Bracknell Forest's own neighbourhoods, so this shows the national picture: England's county and unitary councils grouped into ten by deprivation (IMD 2025). In 2022/23 - 24/25, the figure was 267 per 100,000 in the most deprived tenth and 135 per 100,000 in the least deprived tenth. Taking every group into account, the slope index of inequality puts the gap between the most and least deprived ends at 252 per 100,000, with the figure higher at the most deprived end (likely range 243 to 262 per 100,000). This is unlikely to be down to chance. This shows how the measure varies with deprivation across England; it doesn't describe inequality within Bracknell Forest.
Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93479. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
No figures for children’s oral health are published for areas smaller than the council. These maps show where children live, and where more of them live in income-deprived families, which is linked to more tooth decay. Neither measures oral health.
Choose a measure to see how it varies across Bracknell Forest.
English Indices of Deprivation 2025, by MSOA · prepared by Just Knowledge · 15 local areas (MSOAs)
| Area | Code | Decile | Rank in England (of 6,856) | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priestwood | E02003355 | 5 | 3,371 | 31.5% |
| Bullbrook | E02003357 | 6 | 3,755 | 28.9% |
| Central Bracknell & Wildridings | E02003358 | 6 | 3,863 | 28.2% |
| Hanworth West | E02003362 | 7 | 4,379 | 24.9% |
| Great Hollands | E02003360 | 7 | 4,460 | 24.4% |
| Birch Hill & Hanworth East | E02003361 | 7 | 4,764 | 22.4% |
| Crown Wood | E02003359 | 8 | 5,102 | 20.5% |
| Owlsmoor & Broadmoor | E02003364 | 9 | 5,764 | 16.7% |
| Wick Hill | E02003354 | 9 | 6,017 | 14.8% |
| College Town | E02003366 | 9 | 6,146 | 14.0% |
| Binfield & Popeswood | E02003353 | 10 | 6,178 | 13.8% |
| Sandhurst | E02003365 | 10 | 6,440 | 11.5% |
| Chavey Down & North Ascot West | E02003356 | 10 | 6,664 | 9.0% |
| Crowthorne South | E02003363 | 10 | 6,740 | 7.6% |
| Winkfield & Cranbourne | E02003352 | 10 | 6,805 | 6.1% |
In 2025, Bracknell Forest's 15 local areas (MSOAs) ranged from decile 5 to decile 10 for income deprivation affecting children. Decile 1 is the most deprived 10% of England's 6,856 local areas, and decile 10 the least deprived 10%. The most deprived was Priestwood, the 3,371st most deprived in England. None of the borough's local areas were among the most deprived 20% in England (deciles 1 and 2), and eight were among the least deprived 20% (deciles 9 and 10). 31.5% of children aged 0 to 15 in Priestwood lived in income-deprived families, against 6.1% in Winkfield & Cranbourne.
From England’s official measure of deprivation, 2025. Children in the most deprived areas have more than twice as much tooth decay as those in the least deprived. GOV.UK OHID
The share of children aged 0 to 15 living in income-deprived families (the Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index).
The Indices of Deprivation rank every small area in England from most to least deprived. They combine 55 measures in seven areas of life: income, employment, education and skills, health and disability, crime, barriers to housing and services, and the living environment. MHCLG publishes them for neighbourhoods (LSOAs). Just Knowledge combined the neighbourhoods into local areas (MSOAs), giving each one a weight for the number of people living there.
Source: English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (MHCLG), aggregated to MSOA by Just Knowledge. Boundaries: Office for National Statistics, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025. MSOA names: House of Commons Library. Downloaded 2 October 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
OHID Fingertips · indicator 93084 · 15 local areas (MSOAs)
| Area | Code | Counted | Out of | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Hollands | E02003360 | 2,750 | 11,977 | 23.0% |
| Binfield & Popeswood | E02003353 | 3,200 | 14,283 | 22.4% |
| Priestwood | E02003355 | 1,604 | 7,435 | 21.6% |
| Bullbrook | E02003357 | 2,281 | 10,775 | 21.2% |
| Hanworth West | E02003362 | 1,387 | 6,575 | 21.1% |
| Central Bracknell & Wildridings | E02003358 | 2,591 | 13,113 | 19.8% |
| Birch Hill & Hanworth East | E02003361 | 1,471 | 7,479 | 19.7% |
| Chavey Down & North Ascot West | E02003356 | 1,415 | 7,419 | 19.1% |
| Wick Hill | E02003354 | 1,967 | 10,499 | 18.7% |
| Sandhurst | E02003365 | 1,264 | 6,868 | 18.4% |
| Owlsmoor & Broadmoor | E02003364 | 1,378 | 7,519 | 18.3% |
| Crowthorne South | E02003363 | 1,342 | 7,464 | 18.0% |
| Crown Wood | E02003359 | 1,119 | 6,325 | 17.7% |
| College Town | E02003366 | 1,161 | 7,257 | 16.0% |
| Winkfield & Cranbourne | E02003352 | 829 | 5,818 | 14.2% |
In 2024, 19.7% of residents in Bracknell Forest were aged 0 to 15 (25,759 of 130,806). The figure for England was 18.4%. Across the borough's 15 local areas (MSOAs), it ranged from 14.2% in Winkfield & Cranbourne to 23.0% in Great Hollands. The highest figure was about 1.6 times the lowest.
From ONS’s population estimates. It shows where children live, for context.
Population aged under 16 as a percentage of total population.
Source: OHID Fingertips, indicator 93084 (Office for National Statistics), for MSOAs. Downloaded 10 Nov 2026. Text generated from the data by rule.
We have grouped Bracknell Forest’s 15 local areas (MSOAs, the areas on the maps above) into three neighbourhoods: North, Central and South. Each local area sits in the neighbourhood where most of its residents live, and a neighbourhood’s figures are calculated from its local areas’ published figures. Hover over or tap a row for its details.
Highest in Central, lowest in South (not tested)
Census and ONS population figures come with no margin of error, so they aren’t tested.
Neighbourhood profiles
The charts above show this topic in each of the three neighbourhoods. The neighbourhood profiles turn this round. Each one shows every measure we have for one neighbourhood, across all the topics, from the same data. Use them to see where a neighbourhood is better or worse than the Bracknell Forest average, and which of its local areas stand out.
Coming soon
This section will set out what we don't yet know about oral health in children in Bracknell Forest, so the gaps in the evidence are clear.
It might include:
We'll add this as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment grows. Please check back later.
Coming soon
This section will bring together what this page shows about oral health in children, and what it means for Bracknell Forest.
It might include:
We'll add this as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment grows. Please check back later.
What lies behind the figures, what could make a difference, and what local people and services tell us.
Tooth decay is largely preventable, and the main things that make it more likely are well known. OHID
More on children’s diet and weight is on Childhood healthy weight and physical activity, and on the early years on Early years and school readiness.
What the evidence recommends
Coming soon
This section will share what local people, and the people who support them, tell us about oral health in children.
It might include:
We'll add this as the Joint Strategic Needs Assessment grows. Please check back later.
Where to find out more, and where the figures on this page come from.
Guidance, research, statistics and where to get help, from trusted organisations.
Why children's oral health matters, who is most affected, and what health and care professionals can do to prevent tooth decay.
Patients seen by an NHS dentist and NHS dental activity, by council and area, with new figures by deprivation.
England's survey of adults' oral health, including how often people see a dentist, and the barriers they describe, such as cost, anxiety and difficulty getting there.
The evidence-based guide for dental teams and others on preventing tooth decay and gum disease, including fluoride and diet.
The national survey of tooth decay among five-year-olds, with results for councils, regions, deprivation and ethnic groups.
NICE's guidance for councils on assessing local oral health needs and on community programmes such as supervised toothbrushing.
How to look after children's teeth, from the first tooth: brushing, how much toothpaste, and visits to the dentist.
Find an NHS dentist near you that is taking on new patients.
Most figures on this page come from OHID Fingertips and are refreshed from source. Two files were downloaded from their publishers' websites, because their figures aren't available from those services: English Indices of Deprivation 2025, by MSOA and NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist. They are checked each time the page is built, and replaced when a new version is published.
| Measure | What it measures | Source | Data covers | Updated at source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 year olds with visible tooth decay | Percentage of 5 year olds with observed dental decay extending to the dentine layer | Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, National Dental… | 2007/08 to 2023/24 | 2 April 2025 |
| Hospital admissions for tooth decay (0 to 5) | Finished consultant episodes for dental caries among children aged 0 to 5, rate per 100,000 | OHID, based on NHS England and Office for National Statistics data | 2015/16 - 17/18 to 2022/23 - 24/25 | 11 September 2026 |
| Children aged 0 to 15 | Population aged under 16 as a percentage of total population | Office for National Statistics | 2024, by MSOA | 16 October 2026 |
| English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (local areas) | How deprived each local area is compared with the rest of England, overall and in seven areas of life | Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, prepared by Just Knowledge | 2025, by MSOA | 30 October 2025 |
| NHS Dental Statistics: children seen (NHSBSA) | Children seen by an NHS dentist in the previous 12 months, for every council, each March | NHS Business Services Authority | March 2020 to March 2026, by council | 27 August 2026 |
Percentage of 5 year olds with experience of visually obvious dental decay
Percentage of 5 year olds with dental decay extending to the dentine layer which can be detected by visual observation alone
Limitations. Not all local authorities have taken part in the survey. This means that for any child who has been examined whose LA of residence has not taken part in the survey, their figures will be included in national, regional, deprivation and ethnicity breakdowns, but will not appear in the local authority breakdown.
Collected in Dental Public Health Epidemiology Programme for England: oral health survey of five year… · Published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, National Dental Epidemiology Programme · Updated biennial · Last updated on Fingertips 2 April 2025
Hospital admissions for dental caries (0 to 5 years)
Finished consultant episodes for dental caries among children aged 0 to 5, rate per 100,000.
Limitations. Areas where between 1% and 10% of records had missing sex values have been flagged and should be interpreted with caution. In some instances the data are an underestimate of the number of episodes, as the Community Dental Service may provide the extraction service in hospital premises but the episodes may not be…
Collected in Population Health Analysis, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities · Published by OHID, based on NHS England and Office for National Statistics data · Updated annual · Last updated on Fingertips 11 September 2026
Resident population (aged 0 to 15)
Population aged under 16 as a percentage of total population.
Collected in Office for National Statistics (ONS), Mid year population estimates · Published by Office for National Statistics · Updated annual · Last updated on Fingertips 16 October 2026
English Indices of Deprivation 2025, by MSOA
The Indices of Deprivation rank every small area in England from most to least deprived. They combine 55 measures in seven areas of life: income, employment, education and skills, health and disability, crime, barriers to housing and services, and the living environment. MHCLG publishes them for neighbourhoods (LSOAs). Just Knowledge combined the neighbourhoods into local areas (MSOAs), giving each one a weight for the number of people living there.
Limitations. The indices compare areas with each other. A decile shows where an area ranks in England, not how deprived it is: an area ranked 100th is more deprived than one ranked 200th, but not twice as deprived. They describe areas, not people. Not everyone in a deprived area is deprived, and many people on low incomes live in less deprived areas. A local area's figure is an average of its smaller neighbourhoods, so it can hide pockets of deprivation inside it. The 2025 indices can't be compared with the 2019 ones. MHCLG changed the measures and data behind them, for example to count people on Universal Credit, so the figures are not a time series.
Published by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government on 30 October 2025 · Prepared by Just Knowledge · Downloaded on 2 October 2026 · Next update: not yet known
Credit: English Indices of Deprivation 2025 (MHCLG), aggregated to MSOA by Just Knowledge. Boundaries: Office for National Statistics, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025. MSOA names: House of Commons Library.
NHS Dental Statistics for England: children seen by an NHS dentist
NHS dental practices record every course of treatment they give. The NHS Business Services Authority counts how many children aged 0 to 17 were seen by an NHS dentist in the 12 months to the end of each month, by where they live, beside ONS population estimates for the same ages.
Limitations. It counts NHS dental care only: children seen privately are not included. Children are counted where they live; a child seen more than once counts once. The COVID-19 pandemic cut dental care sharply in 2020 and 2021, so those years are much lower. England is worked out by adding up NHS England regions, including children whose home couldn't be placed; the files have no England row and no ONS regions, so there is no South East figure. NHSBSA publishes no margin of error, so differences are described here but not tested.
Published by NHS Business Services Authority on 27 August 2026 · Downloaded on 13 October 2026 · Next update: not yet known
Credit: NHS Business Services Authority, NHS Dental Statistics for England 2025-26 (official statistics), patients seen by patient location. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.